Search refugee claims, persecution, humanitarian protection, detention, removal orders, and more — backed by real case law.
Asylum claims involve life-and-death stakes for people fleeing persecution — Casey searches millions of court decisions so claimants and lawyers can find the case law that determines how refugee protection is granted or denied.
Asylum claims involve life-and-death stakes for people fleeing persecution — Casey searches millions of court decisions so claimants and lawyers can find the case law that determines how refugee protection is granted or denied.
Real Scenarios
1
Refugee Claim Hearings & Evidence
Refugee hearings at the Immigration and Refugee Board require claimants to establish a well-founded fear of persecution. The standard of proof, credibility assessment, and documentary evidence requirements are all shaped by case law.
Prompt:
“How does the Refugee Protection Division assess credibility in asylum hearings?”
Casey returns decisions where courts reviewed credibility findings, the treatment of inconsistencies, and the principles from Maldonado — showing lawyers what credibility arguments courts have accepted or rejected.
2
Persecution & Protected Grounds
Refugee claims must be based on one of the protected grounds: race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group. The definition of these grounds continues to evolve through case law.
Prompt:
“What qualifies as a particular social group for refugee protection purposes?”
Casey surfaces decisions analyzing the legal test for particular social group, including gender-based claims, sexual orientation, and family-based persecution — helping lawyers frame claims within established legal categories.
3
Humanitarian & Compassionate Applications
When a refugee claim fails, humanitarian and compassionate grounds may offer a last avenue for protection. These discretionary applications require showing establishment in Canada, hardship, and the best interests of children.
Prompt:
“What factors do officers consider in a humanitarian and compassionate application?”
Casey retrieves Federal Court decisions reviewing H&C applications, showing how officers weighed establishment, hardship, country conditions, and the best interests of children — and when courts found those assessments unreasonable.
4
Immigration Detention & Release
Refugee claimants and failed asylum seekers can be detained pending removal or identity verification. Detention reviews happen regularly, but understanding the legal test for release requires reviewing relevant decisions.
Prompt:
“What factors determine whether an immigration detainee should be released?”
Casey returns decisions from detention reviews and courts analyzing flight risk, danger to the public, identity concerns, and alternatives to detention — giving lawyers arguments for release and detainees an understanding of the process.
5
Pre-Removal Risk Assessment
A pre-removal risk assessment is available to people facing deportation who may be at risk in their home country. The legal test differs from the refugee claim standard, and understanding these differences is critical.
Prompt:
“How does a pre-removal risk assessment differ from a refugee claim?”
Casey surfaces cases comparing the PRRA and refugee determination processes, including the new evidence requirement, the standard of review, and how officers assess changed country conditions.
6
Safe Third Country & Eligibility Issues
Not all refugee claims are eligible to be heard in Canada. The Safe Third Country Agreement and other eligibility bars can prevent a claim from proceeding, and understanding the exceptions is essential.
Prompt:
“What exceptions exist to the Safe Third Country Agreement between Canada and the United States?”
Casey returns cases and decisions analyzing the exceptions to the Safe Third Country Agreement, including family member provisions, unaccompanied minors, and the impact of recent legal challenges to the agreement.
Real Scenarios
Refugee hearings at the Immigration and Refugee Board require claimants to establish a well-founded fear of persecution. The standard of proof, credibility assessment, and documentary evidence requirements are all shaped by case law.
Prompt:
“How does the Refugee Protection Division assess credibility in asylum hearings?”
Casey returns decisions where courts reviewed credibility findings, the treatment of inconsistencies, and the principles from Maldonado — showing lawyers what credibility arguments courts have accepted or rejected.
Canada's refugee determination system is considered one of the most independent in the world, with the Immigration and Refugee Board operating as a quasi-judicial tribunal separate from the government department that processes immigration applications.
Ask Casey your question and get answers backed by real case law — free for the public, powerful for professionals.