caseway

Solutions

Integrations

Pricing

Child Custody Research with Casey

Search best interests determinations, sole versus joint custody, parenting plans, relocation disputes, custody modification, and more — backed by real case law.

Why Child Custody Research Matters

Custody decisions determine where children live and how they are raised after separation — Casey searches millions of court decisions to return verified rulings on parenting arrangements, decision-making responsibility, and the factors courts consider most important.

Why Child Custody Research Matters

Custody decisions determine where children live and how they are raised after separation — Casey searches millions of court decisions to return verified rulings on parenting arrangements, decision-making responsibility, and the factors courts consider most important.

Real Scenarios

How Casey Helps With Real Child Custody Questions

1

Best Interests of the Child

The best interests of the child is the paramount consideration in every custody decision. Courts evaluate a comprehensive list of factors including the child's needs, the quality of each parent's relationship with the child, and each parent's willingness to support the child's relationship with the other parent.

Prompt:

“What factors do courts consider when determining the best interests of the child in custody cases?”

Casey returns decisions applying the best interests factors under the Divorce Act, how courts weighed the child's physical and emotional needs, the impact of family violence, the child's views, and each parent's ability to meet the child's needs.

2

Sole Versus Joint Custody

Courts must decide whether one parent will have sole decision-making responsibility or whether both parents will share it. Joint custody requires a reasonable level of communication and cooperation between the parents, and courts assess whether this is realistic given the family's circumstances.

Prompt:

“When will a court order sole custody instead of joint custody?”

Casey surfaces rulings where sole custody was ordered due to high conflict, inability to communicate, family violence, or fundamental disagreements on parenting, and how courts assessed whether joint decision-making was workable.

3

Parenting Plans and Schedules

Parenting plans set out how time will be divided between the parents and how decisions will be made. Courts consider the child's age, school schedule, each parent's availability, and the distance between the parents' homes when establishing or modifying parenting arrangements.

Prompt:

“How do courts decide on a parenting schedule for a toddler with two working parents?”

Casey retrieves cases addressing age-appropriate parenting schedules, the attachment needs of young children, how courts balanced equal parenting time with the need for a primary home, and the gradual increase of overnights as children mature.

4

Relocation Disputes

When a parent wishes to move with the child to a new city or country, the other parent may object. Recent amendments to the Divorce Act set out a framework for relocation cases, including notice requirements and the factors courts must consider.

Prompt:

“Can a custodial parent relocate with a child to another province over the other parent's objection?”

Casey returns decisions applying the Divorce Act relocation provisions, how courts assessed the reason for the move, the impact on the child's relationship with the non-moving parent, the feasibility of revised parenting arrangements, and the burden of proof on each party.

5

Modification of Custody Orders

Custody orders can be changed when there has been a material change in circumstances since the original order. Courts assess whether the change is significant, whether it was foreseeable at the time of the original order, and whether a new arrangement would better serve the child's interests.

Prompt:

“What qualifies as a material change in circumstances to modify a custody order?”

Casey surfaces rulings on what constitutes a material change, including changes in the child's needs, a parent's relocation, new safety concerns, the child's expressed wishes as they mature, and how courts applied the threshold for reopening settled arrangements.

6

Voice of the Child

As children mature, their views and preferences carry increasing weight in custody decisions. Courts may receive the child's perspective through a Section 211 report, a views of the child report, or in some cases by speaking with the child directly.

Prompt:

“At what age will a court consider a child's preference about which parent to live with?”

Casey returns cases discussing the weight given to children's views at various ages, how courts assessed the maturity and independence of the child's wishes, the methods used to obtain the child's perspective, and when a child's strong preference was overridden by other best interests factors.

Real Scenarios

How Casey Helps With Real Child Custody Questions

The best interests of the child is the paramount consideration in every custody decision. Courts evaluate a comprehensive list of factors including the child's needs, the quality of each parent's relationship with the child, and each parent's willingness to support the child's relationship with the other parent.

Prompt:

“What factors do courts consider when determining the best interests of the child in custody cases?”

Casey returns decisions applying the best interests factors under the Divorce Act, how courts weighed the child's physical and emotional needs, the impact of family violence, the child's views, and each parent's ability to meet the child's needs.

Courts must decide whether one parent will have sole decision-making responsibility or whether both parents will share it. Joint custody requires a reasonable level of communication and cooperation between the parents, and courts assess whether this is realistic given the family's circumstances.

Prompt:

“When will a court order sole custody instead of joint custody?”

Casey surfaces rulings where sole custody was ordered due to high conflict, inability to communicate, family violence, or fundamental disagreements on parenting, and how courts assessed whether joint decision-making was workable.

Parenting plans set out how time will be divided between the parents and how decisions will be made. Courts consider the child's age, school schedule, each parent's availability, and the distance between the parents' homes when establishing or modifying parenting arrangements.

Prompt:

“How do courts decide on a parenting schedule for a toddler with two working parents?”

Casey retrieves cases addressing age-appropriate parenting schedules, the attachment needs of young children, how courts balanced equal parenting time with the need for a primary home, and the gradual increase of overnights as children mature.

When a parent wishes to move with the child to a new city or country, the other parent may object. Recent amendments to the Divorce Act set out a framework for relocation cases, including notice requirements and the factors courts must consider.

Prompt:

“Can a custodial parent relocate with a child to another province over the other parent's objection?”

Casey returns decisions applying the Divorce Act relocation provisions, how courts assessed the reason for the move, the impact on the child's relationship with the non-moving parent, the feasibility of revised parenting arrangements, and the burden of proof on each party.

Custody orders can be changed when there has been a material change in circumstances since the original order. Courts assess whether the change is significant, whether it was foreseeable at the time of the original order, and whether a new arrangement would better serve the child's interests.

Prompt:

“What qualifies as a material change in circumstances to modify a custody order?”

Casey surfaces rulings on what constitutes a material change, including changes in the child's needs, a parent's relocation, new safety concerns, the child's expressed wishes as they mature, and how courts applied the threshold for reopening settled arrangements.

As children mature, their views and preferences carry increasing weight in custody decisions. Courts may receive the child's perspective through a Section 211 report, a views of the child report, or in some cases by speaking with the child directly.

Prompt:

“At what age will a court consider a child's preference about which parent to live with?”

Casey returns cases discussing the weight given to children's views at various ages, how courts assessed the maturity and independence of the child's wishes, the methods used to obtain the child's perspective, and when a child's strong preference was overridden by other best interests factors.

Did you know?

In 2021, Canada's Divorce Act was amended to replace the terms 'custody' and 'access' with 'decision-making responsibility' and 'parenting time.' The change was intended to reduce the adversarial framing of parenting disputes, though many provincial family law statutes still use the older terminology.

Ready to research child custody?

Ask Casey your question and get answers backed by real case law — free for the public, powerful for professionals.

EXPLORE PLATFORMCONTACT SALES
EXPLORE PLATFORMCONTACT SALES

caseway

Purpose-built for organizations that can't afford errors.

Have Questions? Get in Touch

BOOK A DEMOCONTACT US

Products

CaseySynthium DataHubCaseFormOmniFill

Company

ContactAboutTeamCareerInvestor RelationsIn The Media

Resources

Practice AreasSearch Court CasesPricingSolutionsIntegrationsTestimonialsBlogVideosFAQsVeterans DiscountStudent DiscountCaseForm + MyCase

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

caseway

Purpose-built for organizations that can't afford errors.

Products

CaseySynthium DataHubCaseFormOmniFill

Company

ContactAboutTeamCareerInvestor RelationsIn The Media

Resources

Practice AreasSearch Court CasesPricingSolutionsIntegrationsTestimonialsBlogVideosFAQsVeterans DiscountStudent DiscountCaseForm + MyCase

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

Have Questions? Get in Touch

BOOK A DEMOCONTACT US

In compliance with SOC 2

In compliance with ISO/IEC 42001

© 2026 Caseway. All Rights Reserved.