Search Ponzi schemes, broker misconduct, misrepresentation, insider trading, investor recovery, and more — backed by real case law.
Investment fraud can wipe out life savings and retirement funds — Casey searches millions of court decisions to help defrauded investors, regulators, and lawyers find precedents for recovering losses and holding bad actors accountable.
Investment fraud can wipe out life savings and retirement funds — Casey searches millions of court decisions to help defrauded investors, regulators, and lawyers find precedents for recovering losses and holding bad actors accountable.
Real Scenarios
1
Ponzi Schemes & Fraudulent Investment Funds
Ponzi schemes are often discovered only after they collapse, leaving investors scrambling to understand their legal options. Courts have addressed clawback actions, receiver recoveries, and the rights of early versus late investors. Casey surfaces decisions relevant to your situation.
Prompt:
“Can investors who withdrew profits from a Ponzi scheme before it collapsed be forced to return those profits?”
Casey returns cases where courts addressed clawback actions against net winners in Ponzi schemes, examining the good faith defence and how courts calculated amounts subject to recovery.
2
Broker Misconduct & Suitability
Investment advisors and brokers have a duty to recommend investments suitable for their clients. When they push unsuitable products or churn accounts, clients can seek compensation. Casey retrieves cases addressing broker misconduct claims.
Prompt:
“What damages can an investor recover when a broker recommended high-risk investments that were unsuitable for a retiree?”
Casey surfaces decisions where courts and securities commissions awarded damages for unsuitable investment recommendations, including how tribunals calculated losses and assessed the broker's knowledge of the client's risk tolerance.
3
Misrepresentation & Prospectus Fraud
Investors who relied on false or misleading information in prospectuses, offering documents, or advisor statements may have claims for misrepresentation. Courts examine what was said, what was omitted, and whether the investor reasonably relied on the information.
Prompt:
“What do courts require to prove that an investor relied on a material misrepresentation when deciding to invest?”
Casey retrieves decisions applying the reliance test for investment misrepresentation, including cases where courts found both individual and class-wide reliance on misleading disclosure documents.
4
Insider Trading Enforcement
Insider trading cases involve complex questions about what constitutes material non-public information and when a person is considered an insider. Securities commissions and courts have developed detailed tests for these elements. Casey helps you find the relevant decisions.
Prompt:
“How do courts define material non-public information in the context of insider trading prosecutions?”
Casey returns decisions where courts defined materiality for insider trading purposes, including how judges assessed whether information would have reasonably affected an investor's decision to buy or sell.
5
Investor Recovery & Compensation Funds
Defrauded investors have multiple paths to recovery including civil suits, regulatory proceedings, and industry compensation funds. Courts have addressed the interplay between these remedies and the practical challenges of collection. Casey surfaces relevant recovery decisions.
Prompt:
“What options does an investor have to recover losses when the person who defrauded them has no assets?”
Casey surfaces cases where investors pursued alternative recovery paths, including claims against brokerage firms, compensation funds, and negligent auditors or compliance officers who failed to detect the fraud.
6
Regulatory Sanctions & Market Bans
Securities regulators can impose market bans, fines, and disgorgement orders against individuals who violate securities laws. These proceedings have their own legal standards and procedural rules. Casey retrieves decisions from securities commissions and courts reviewing those decisions.
Prompt:
“What factors do securities commissions consider when deciding whether to impose a permanent market ban?”
Casey returns securities commission decisions outlining the factors for permanent bans, including the seriousness of the misconduct, harm to investors, deterrence, and the respondent's prior regulatory history.
Real Scenarios
Ponzi schemes are often discovered only after they collapse, leaving investors scrambling to understand their legal options. Courts have addressed clawback actions, receiver recoveries, and the rights of early versus late investors. Casey surfaces decisions relevant to your situation.
Prompt:
“Can investors who withdrew profits from a Ponzi scheme before it collapsed be forced to return those profits?”
Casey returns cases where courts addressed clawback actions against net winners in Ponzi schemes, examining the good faith defence and how courts calculated amounts subject to recovery.
Securities regulators estimate that investment fraud costs Canadians billions of dollars each year, with seniors being disproportionately targeted — yet many victims never pursue legal action because they are embarrassed or unaware of their rights.
Ask Casey your question and get answers backed by real case law — free for the public, powerful for professionals.