Search fraud, embezzlement, money laundering, insider trading, corporate crime, and more — backed by real case law.
White collar crime prosecutions involve complex financial evidence and lengthy proceedings — Casey searches millions of court decisions so lawyers and accused individuals can find the case law that shapes fraud, money laundering, and corporate crime defences.
White collar crime prosecutions involve complex financial evidence and lengthy proceedings — Casey searches millions of court decisions so lawyers and accused individuals can find the case law that shapes fraud, money laundering, and corporate crime defences.
Real Scenarios
1
Fraud Charges & Elements of the Offence
Fraud under the Criminal Code requires proof of dishonesty and deprivation or risk of deprivation. The application of these elements to business transactions, investment schemes, and financial dealings involves nuanced case law.
Prompt:
“What does the Crown need to prove for a fraud over $5,000 conviction?”
Casey returns cases where courts analyzed the elements of fraud, the meaning of dishonesty and deprivation, and how judges drew the line between aggressive business practices and criminal conduct.
2
Money Laundering & Proceeds of Crime
Money laundering charges require proving that the accused dealt with property knowing or being reckless about its criminal origin. The offence captures a wide range of financial transactions and the penalties are significant.
Prompt:
“What constitutes knowledge or recklessness for money laundering charges in Canada?”
Casey surfaces decisions where courts interpreted the mental element for money laundering, including willful blindness, the scope of predicate offences, and how prosecutors proved the criminal origin of funds.
3
Insider Trading & Securities Fraud
Insider trading and securities fraud can be prosecuted under both criminal law and provincial securities legislation. The dual enforcement regime creates complex jurisdictional and procedural issues that require specialized research.
Prompt:
“How do Canadian courts distinguish between legitimate trading and insider trading?”
Casey retrieves cases analyzing the definition of material non-public information, the connection between the information and the trading, and how courts assessed whether the accused had knowledge that their trading was improper.
4
Corporate Criminal Liability
Organizations can face criminal charges when senior officers direct, authorize, or fail to prevent criminal conduct. The legal framework for corporate criminal liability was reformed in 2004, and courts continue to interpret its scope.
Prompt:
“When is a corporation criminally liable for the actions of its employees?”
Casey returns cases applying the organizational liability provisions, analyzing the role of senior officers, the directing mind doctrine, and how courts assessed corporate due diligence in preventing criminal conduct.
5
Embezzlement & Breach of Trust
Criminal breach of trust and theft by a person in a position of trust carry enhanced sentencing. These cases often involve employees, fiduciaries, or public officials, and the breach of trust element significantly affects the outcome.
Prompt:
“How does a position of trust affect sentencing for theft or fraud?”
Casey surfaces decisions where courts treated breach of trust as an aggravating factor, the sentencing ranges for employees and fiduciaries who misappropriated funds, and how courts quantified the impact on victims.
6
Regulatory vs Criminal Investigations
White collar matters often involve parallel regulatory and criminal investigations. Understanding the information-sharing rules, privilege protections, and how statements made in regulatory proceedings can affect criminal cases is essential.
Prompt:
“Can statements made during a regulatory investigation be used in a subsequent criminal prosecution?”
Casey returns cases addressing the use of compelled statements, the principle against self-incrimination, and how courts handled the boundary between regulatory cooperation and criminal jeopardy in financial investigations.
Real Scenarios
Fraud under the Criminal Code requires proof of dishonesty and deprivation or risk of deprivation. The application of these elements to business transactions, investment schemes, and financial dealings involves nuanced case law.
Prompt:
“What does the Crown need to prove for a fraud over $5,000 conviction?”
Casey returns cases where courts analyzed the elements of fraud, the meaning of dishonesty and deprivation, and how judges drew the line between aggressive business practices and criminal conduct.
Canada introduced a mandatory minimum sentence of two years for fraud over one million dollars in 2011, making large-scale fraud one of the few non-violent offences with a mandatory prison term.
Ask Casey your question and get answers backed by real case law — free for the public, powerful for professionals.